Migrating an engineering team from local to cloud coding agents
November 9, 2026 · 3 min read · By the bestcloudagents team
bestcloudagents is operated by Replicas, one of the products discussed here. Every claim about a product comes from its own docs or pricing; see how we score.
Most teams start with coding agents on laptops: an engineer runs Claude Code or Codex in a terminal, pairs with it, and ships faster. The ceiling arrives quickly. The agent stops when the laptop sleeps, runs one task at a time, uses whatever is installed on that machine, and nobody else can see what it's doing.
Moving agents to the cloud lifts that ceiling. Moda, a Replicas customer, moved its entire engineering team from local IDEs to cloud agents. Their CEO, Pranav Bedi:
"Going from local to cloud coding agents was arguably as big of a jump as using coding agents in the first place."
Here's how to make the move without losing a sprint to it.
What actually changes
| Local agents | Cloud agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it runs | The engineer's laptop | A VM per task |
| How many at once | One or two | As many as the work needs |
| When the laptop closes | It stops | It keeps going |
| Environment | Whatever's installed locally | Defined once for the team |
| Who can see it | The engineer | The team, with history and PRs |
| How work starts | A terminal | Slack, Linear, GitHub, GitLab, schedules |
| Output | Local changes | A pull request |
The agent itself can stay the same. Platforms such as Replicas run Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode in the cloud, so engineers keep the agent and the instructions files they already know.
Step 1: Pick one repository and define its environment
Choose a repository with decent tests and active work. Write down what a new engineer needs to be productive in it: system packages, language versions, services (a database, a queue), seed data, environment variables. That becomes the cloud environment's setup hooks and secrets.
Get it right once, at the team level, and every agent run inherits it. This is the step that most determines whether cloud agents produce mergeable work.
Step 2: Sort out credentials
Decide how models are paid for:
- Engineers' own plans. Each person signs the agent in with their Claude or ChatGPT subscription.
- Team API keys. An Anthropic or OpenAI key, or AWS Bedrock or Microsoft Foundry, for shared channels and automations.
- Both. Personal plans for interactive work, a team key for automations.
Keep secrets in the platform's secret store or sync them from Doppler or Infisical, never in prompts. Scope what each environment can reach.
Step 3: Start where work already lives
Connect the places your team already hands work around: Slack, Linear, GitHub, GitLab. Then pick a first category of work that's easy to review:
- small bugs with clear reproduction steps,
- dependency bumps and lint or type fixes,
- test coverage for existing code,
- code review comments on every pull request.
Step 4: Keep review human
Agents open pull requests; people merge them. Turn on policies that stop agents from merging their own work, and have commits carry the identity of the person who started the run. Ask agents for evidence (test output, screenshots or a recording) so reviewers aren't guessing.
Step 5: Add automations
Once interactive use is working, add runs that start without anyone asking: a nightly maintenance pass, a fix attempt on every failed CI run, a triage run on new Sentry errors, a review on every pull request. Parrot, a Replicas customer, ran 23.5k automated cloud-agent jobs in July alone this way.
The first 30 days
- Week 1: one repository, one environment, three volunteers.
- Week 2: connect Slack and your tracker; start routing small bugs.
- Week 3: open it to the whole team; add a review automation.
- Week 4: look at the numbers: pull requests by source and engineer, cost per merged PR, the runs that went sideways. Fix the environment where agents struggled.
What not to move
Cloud agents are for delegation. Engineers who like pairing with an agent in their editor should keep doing that locally; the two coexist. If your team's work is almost entirely hands-on pairing, a local-first tool such as Cursor or Claude Code in the terminal may be the better primary choice, and the chooser will tell you so.
For the cost side of the move, see per-run agent cost attribution.
Get a second opinion on your shortlist
Tell us what you're weighing and an engineer from the Replicas team, who operate this site, will reply by email. We'll point you to whichever option fits, including when that isn't Replicas.
Keep reading
The best cloud coding agents for engineering teams in 2026
Replicas, Devin, Cursor Cloud Agents, Claude Code on the web, Codex cloud and OpenCode compared on what matters to a team lead, with the cases where each one wins.
How to run Claude Code in the cloud (and keep it running when your laptop sleeps)
Four ways to run Claude Code in the cloud, from Anthropic's own Claude Code on the web to a rented VM, GitHub Actions and Replicas, with what each needs and costs.
Why your team needs a multi-harness cloud coding agent platform
What a multi-harness platform is, why the agent is becoming a commodity while the environment is not, and what to check before you commit to one agent's cloud.