Full comparison

Cloud coding agents, criterion by criterion

What each product does, taken from its own docs and pricing pages as of November 9, 2026. Green is a yes, amber is partial support, red is a no, and grey means we couldn't confirm it from public sources.

CriterionReplicasDevinCursorClaude CodeCodexOpenCode
Agents
Multi-harness supportYesClaude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Pi and Muse Code; pick the agent per taskNoDevin's own agent; you choose models inside it, not other agentsNoThe Cursor agent with a curated set of modelsNoClaude Code onlyNoCodex onlyNoOpenCode only, but with 75+ model providers
Environment
Isolated cloud VM per taskYesEach workspace is its own isolated Linux VM (2, 4 or 8 vCPU)YesEach session boots a fresh copy of the organization's snapshot in a Linux VMYesCloud Agents run in isolated VMs with full development environmentsYesClaude Code on the web runs each session in an Anthropic-managed Ubuntu VM (about 4 vCPU, 16 GB)YesCodex cloud runs tasks in OpenAI VMs (2 vCPU/8 GiB on Plus, 4 vCPU/16 GiB on Pro and Business)PartlyRuns wherever you put it; you provide and isolate the VM or container
Workflow
Pull request outputYesThe agent opens the pull request (GitHub) or merge request (GitLab)YesReturns pull requests for reviewYesCloud Agents push a branch and open pull requests with screenshots, videos and logsPartlyCloud sessions push a branch; you create the PR from the sessionPartlyYou open the PR from the finished taskPartly/oc comments through its GitHub integration; otherwise you script it
Local IDE workflowNoAgents run only in the cloud; the desktop app and CLI connect to cloud workspaces and can open one in VS CodeYesDevin Desktop and Devin CLIYesThe Cursor editor and CLIYesTerminal CLI and IDE extensions; --teleport pulls a cloud session into your terminalYesCLI, IDE extension and ChatGPT desktop appYesTerminal, desktop app and IDE integrations
Where work starts
Start from SlackYesMentions, DMs and threadsYesSlack and Microsoft TeamsYes@cursor in SlackCheckConfirm current Slack support with AnthropicCheckConfirm current Slack support with OpenAICheckNot part of the core tool; confirm or build it
Start from LinearYesAssign or mention on an issueYesListed as an integrationYes@cursor in LinearCheckConfirm with AnthropicCheckConfirm with OpenAICheckNot part of the core tool; confirm or build it
Start from GitHubYesMention on issues and PRs; can act on failed checks and reviewsYesA PR comment starting with /devin starts a sessionYes@cursor on a GitHub PR or issueYesGitHub repositories; @claude in issues and PRs through claude-code-actionYesGitHub repositories; @codex review on pull requestsYes/oc comments on GitHub issues and PRs
Start from GitLabYesIssues and merge requests; one workspace can span GitHub and GitLabYesGitLab and Bitbucket; self-managed GitLab on EnterprisePartlyWorks on GitLab repositories; @cursor comments are documented for GitHub and BitbucketPartlyGitLab repos can be sent as a bundle, but cloud sessions can't push backNoGitHub only for now; GitLab is on OpenAI's roadmapCheckConfirm with the OpenCode project
Start from JiraNoAgents can use Jira through a plugin, but a Jira issue can't start a taskYesStarts work from Jira issuesCheckConfirm with CursorCheckConfirm with AnthropicCheckConfirm with OpenAICheckNot part of the core tool
Models and billing
Bring your own model keysYesAnthropic, OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter, Cursor and OpenAI-compatible keysPartlyA ChatGPT plan can pay for GPT usage; no API-key option is documentedNoCloud Agents bill your Cursor plan's usage at model ratesPartlyCloud sessions need a Claude plan; API keys and Bedrock aren't supported there (the CLI takes them)PartlyCodex cloud requires a ChatGPT sign-in; API keys work only in the CLIYes75+ providers through your own keys, plus local models
Use your Claude or ChatGPT planYesClaude and ChatGPT subscriptionsPartlyChatGPT plans onlyNoUses Cursor's own plansYesPro, Max, Team and eligible Enterprise seatsYesChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and EduYesChatGPT Plus or Pro, GitHub Copilot and GitLab Duo sign-ins
Usage-based compute pricingYesBilled per workspace minute by VM size; sleeping and archived workspaces cost nothing; seats are freePartlyUsage quota plus credits; Teams adds $40 per seatPartlyPlan usage at model rates; Cloud Agents need a Premium, Teams or Enterprise planNoSeat-based plans from $20/mo; no separate VM chargeNoSeat-based ChatGPT plans from $20/moPartlyThe software is free; your servers cost whatever you pay for them, idle or not
Security and governance
SOC 2 reportYesSOC 2 Type IYesSOC 2 Type IIYesSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001CheckCheck Anthropic's Trust CenterCheckCheck OpenAI's Trust PortalPartlyCompliance is your infrastructure's; there is no vendor service to audit
SOC 2 Type II todayNoSOC 2 Type II is in progressYesSOC 2 Type II since September 2024YesSOC 2 Type II attestationCheckCheck Anthropic's Trust CenterCheckCheck OpenAI's Trust PortalPartlyCompliance is your infrastructure's
SCIM provisioningYesSCIM provisioning on EnterpriseCheckSAML and OIDC SSO on Enterprise; confirm SCIM with CognitionYesSSO and SCIMCheckCheck the Claude Enterprise planCheckCheck the ChatGPT Enterprise planNoNo hosted user management
Audit logYesAudit log of every configuration changeYesAudit logs on EnterpriseYesCompliance and audit logs on EnterpriseCheckCheck the Claude Enterprise planCheckCheck the ChatGPT Enterprise planPartlyWhatever logging you build around it
Self-hosted or dedicated deploymentYesSelf-hosted or dedicated single-tenant deployment on EnterprisePartlyA dedicated VPC run by Cognition; Outposts move command execution to your machinesPartlySelf-hosted machines for tool execution; the service itself is Cursor-hostedPartlyCloud sessions are Anthropic-hosted; the CLI can run on servers you controlPartlyCodex cloud is OpenAI-hosted; the Apache-2.0 CLI runs anywhereYesRuns entirely on your own machines
HIPAA BAAYesHIPAA BAA on EnterpriseCheckConfirm with CognitionCheckConfirm with CursorCheckConfirm with AnthropicCheckConfirm with OpenAIPartlyDepends on where you run it and which model provider you use
Scale
Parallel runsYesRun many workspaces at once and compare them side by sideYesUp to 10 concurrent sessions on Pro, unlimited on Max and TeamsYesAs many Cloud Agents in parallel as you wantYesSeveral cloud sessions at onceYesSeveral cloud tasks at oncePartlyAs many copies as you run
Scheduled and event-driven runsYesSchedules and GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Sentry and webhook eventsYesScheduled sessions (presets or cron)YesCloud Agent automationsPartlyThrough GitHub Actions or your own schedulerPartlyThrough codex-action in GitHub workflowsPartlyThrough cron or CI you set up

Spotted something out of date? Vendors ship fast. Use the form on any page and we'll correct it.

The products

Replicas by Replicas Group Inc.

A cloud coding-agent platform that runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Pi and Muse Code in isolated cloud VMs, started from Slack, Linear, GitHub, GitLab or the dashboard, and hands back pull requests.

Best for: Teams that want several agents working in parallel in the cloud, on their own model accounts, started from the tools they already use.

Sources: Replicas facts, Replicas pricing, Replicas enterprise, Replicas docs

Devin by Cognition

Cognition's autonomous software engineer: its own agent, cloud sessions in a VM, an editor (Devin Desktop, formerly Windsurf), a CLI and a codebase wiki.

Best for: Teams that want one vendor's agent end to end, start work from Jira, or need a SOC 2 Type II report today.

Sources: Devin pricing, Devin docs, Replicas vs Devin source list · Replicas vs Devin

Cursor by Anysphere

An AI code editor whose Cloud Agents run the Cursor agent in isolated cloud VMs and return pull requests, started from the editor, the web, Slack, Linear, GitHub or the API.

Best for: Teams whose engineers live in the Cursor editor and want cloud runs connected to that local workflow.

Sources: Cursor Cloud Agents docs, Cursor security, Cursor pricing · Replicas vs Cursor

Claude Code by Anthropic

Anthropic's coding agent: a terminal CLI and IDE extensions, plus Claude Code on the web, which runs sessions in an Anthropic-managed VM.

Best for: Teams standardised on Claude Code, on GitHub, who already pay for Claude plans and mostly pair with the agent locally.

Sources: Claude Code on the web, Claude Code GitHub Actions, Claude pricing · Replicas vs Claude Code on the web

Codex by OpenAI

OpenAI's coding agent: an open-source CLI, IDE extension and SDK, plus Codex cloud, which runs tasks in OpenAI-hosted environments from ChatGPT.

Best for: Teams standardised on Codex and ChatGPT plans, working in GitHub.

Sources: Codex cloud, Codex pricing, Codex authentication · Replicas vs Codex cloud

OpenCode by OpenCode (open source)

An MIT-licensed terminal coding agent that works with 75+ model providers and local models. Run it yourself on a laptop, a server or CI.

Best for: Teams that want an open-source agent on any model and are happy to run and secure the infrastructure themselves.

Sources: OpenCode docs, OpenCode providers, OpenCode GitHub integration · Replicas vs running OpenCode yourself